Showing posts with label bacteria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bacteria. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

CAN FRESH PRODUCE "ABSORB" PATHOGENIC BACTERIA AND VIRUS? A DEBATING POINT

Contrary to the strong belief that plant foods are less vulnerable to contamination with bacteria and virus, an analysis of food poisoning episodes due to pathogens during the last one decade clearly shows that they can be equally at risks as the meat products are in contracting infection from the field. Too much attention to animal farms, abattoirs and poultry farms by the safety monitoring authorities probably ignored the potential for microbial contamination of plant foods from the growing areas through water, soil and manure. It was rather startling to note that almost half the food poisoning episodes in the world originated in plant foods like leafy greens, cantaloupes, mangoes, strawberries, peanuts, walnuts and others causing significant mortality among consumers. This situation probably calls for a more vigorous study to get a better insight into this reality. 

The cultivation practices and the farm land locations do contribute to the vulnerability of agricultural crops to microbiological contamination. Inputs like water, and manure can be critical in maintaining freedom from pathogens while proximity to animal and poultry farms and sewage processing facilities makes the plant crops doubly susceptible to cross contamination with high probability. If the cultivated area is near to forest areas visits by animals during nights cannot be entirely avoided and their fecal droppings are a strong source of microbes of different types with varying pathogenicity. There is also the possibility of pathogens getting on vegetables and fruits in processing facilities where they are cleaned up and packed for distribution to super markets. Storage and distribution facilities if not properly sanitized frequently can cause cross contamination. In the absence of reliable traceability regime it may e next to impossible to pin point the source of contamination.

A revealing fact is that in most contamination episodes with fruits and vegetables the pathogens are found mostly on the surface though no studies have ever been carried out to find out whether these bacteria are present inside also and if so how deep they are inside. It will be a terrible tragedy if contaminating organisms find their way inside the plant and the crops through the root system. After all the fields where plants are grown can have billions of microorganisms belonging to hundreds of different species, most of them benign but some highly pathogenic. It has  to be remembered that the deadly E.coli O157:H7 strain which caused many poisoning episodes during the last few years originated in the field where soil was contaminated with fecal droppings of animals like deer and pigs. In spite of so many studies taken up to find whether disease causing bugs like bacteria and viruses can really be absorbed by the roots to be ending up in edible parts of the plant, no evidence had surfaced which support the theory that they might enter the plant under right circumstances.

It is true many bacteria show an ability to migrate towards the roots of many plants but they stay just there without migrating into the internal parts of the plant. Yet they do posses the potential to spread to other external parts of the plant during harvesting and cleaning. This is the reason why new food safety laws being enacted in some countries stipulate that for ensuring safety of fresh produce it is imperative that pathogen free water is used for irrigation and washing, the equipment and machinery deployed do not harbor pathogens and the farm workers are provided with clean water for washing their hands clean during all farm operations. In fact growing of organic foods is an ideal model for main stream agriculture community to emulate for keeping their produce free from disease causing microorganisms. Probably world is moving slowly to a stage where fresh produce which are consumed without cooking are grown only under strictest environmental and field conditions that will not give any scope for contamination with bacteria like Listeria, Salmonella and E.coli O157:H7.

When food borne diseases are discussed there is a unique creature that causes more than 60% of food poisoning episodes which has not received much attention at the hands of food microbiologists and this is the ubiquitous Noroviruses which can contaminate foods during handling stage. It was recently discovered that these viruses have the uncanny ability to contaminate surface areas of fruits and vegetables and normal washing may not be that much effective in getting rid of them easily. This is all the more true with leafy greens like spinach and lettuce which have many openings on the leaf surface called stomata for regulating transmission of gases and water vapor. The guard cells which are located on the surface of the cells can be penetrated easily by viruses,  provide a safe place for the viruses especially when there is a film of water on the surface. Standard washing procedures are not effective in gorging them out and if the contamination density is high, such consignments can cause poisoning episodes when sold in the retail market. Probably in such cases prevention is better than cure and there is no alternative but to guard against contamination at every stage of handling them to exclude incidence of Norovirus contamination.                    

Monday, May 20, 2013

WEIGHT LOSS AND THE BACTERIA-IS THERE A HOLY NEXUS?

Do bacteria play a role in controlling body weight in humans? On the face of it this theory may be far fetched but tentative studies indirectly do indicate that these tiny creatures living in different parts of human body help to maintain good health and disturbing their equilibrium can possibly lead to  undesirable consequences such as lower immunity and bloated bodies.  Over weight and obesity can be quite debilitating, as such morbid conditions invariably contribute many diseases like CVD, Hypertension, Kidney disorders etc and there is a global concern that if not given adequate attention to this potentially dangerous situation, this world will be full of morbid people making every body's life miserable.

There are many dietary regimes proposed for weight control and different diets help different people to varying extent. Who does not know about Atkins Diet or South Beach Diet which were once a craze with weight watchers but all of them eventually faded from the scene because of the uncertainties associated with such restrictive diets. If BMI is used as a criterion, those having values beyond 30 need to watch out for complications arising out of overweight and beyond a BMI value of 35 it can be obese becoming morbid obesity if it still goes higher. Those who are desperate do go on strict diet control for a stipulated time, do lose significant weight but promptly regains the weight once diet restriction is removed. In the case of diabetics, efficient blood glucose control can make a difference between normal life and dangerous flirting with even death. The HbA1C values recorded quarterly beyond 7 is considered unhealthy. As restrictions on sugar become more and more acute, the cravings for sweet foods also become more and more irresistible!


Surgical intervention like Bariatric surgery, intestinal stapling etc become imperative under extreme conditions of obesity to prevent development of morbidity but these are all considered unnatural becoming an option only under extreme conditions.  There is even a stomach pump available that can evacuate the stomach contents within 20-30 minutes of consuming the food!  What kind of life these unfortunate victims will have after such surgical interventions? Out of millions of people, hardly a couple hundred thousands opt for surgery to get relief from the sufferings associated with overweight and obesity. Thus there is a genuine need to evolve a much more simpler technique which can bring relief to these people vulnerable to putting on weight or resistance to shedding weight through natural process of dietary control. Of course the theory that overweight is net game between calorie intake and calorie expenditure through physical activity still holds good but most consumers find it extremely difficult to "manage" their daily calorie intake by controlling the food intake and an active exercise regimen.


Here comes the role of microorganisms which have become omnipotent in every walk of life to day. The importance of prebiotic and probiotic foods in maintaining good gut health is already well known in qualitative terms but knowledge about which microorganisms do what is still somewhat hazy. Thousands of processed foods containing such microbes in active form are offered by the industry and an active cell count of 4 billion live cells is considered desirable for getting the benefits of these health foods. Here again opinion varies regarding what species are more effective and what is the most desirable proportion some of these microbes must be present in the food. It is also not clear whether the type of diet consumed has any bearing on the efficacy of function of these microbes and what should be desirable consumption levels in daily diets. Thus the picture that is presented to the consumer lacks clarity and raise many unanswered questions.


It is a fact that in human beings microbial cells outnumber human ones, and many new studies have brought out the crucial role played by trillions of bacteria and other microorganisms that live in their own ecosystem in the gut. Recent discovery that Clostridium difficile bacteria can infect people through exposure to hospitals, nursing homes and such community centers and most antibiotics known to man are ineffective in controlling the infection, was quite baffling for some time. Antibiotics, which are used nowadays routinely to treat even a mild cold,  were found to wipe out many natural microorganisms present in the guts which would have normally kept C. difficile in check. It is scary to imagine that severe cases of  such infection can be life-threatening and after running out of all options the medical profession is gradually coming to accept the somewhat startling idea that the best therapy that works involves a fecal transplant from a healthy person to the one who is sick. This is to rehabilitate the population of beneficial microorganisms that were present in the guts before administration of antibiotics.


The focus has now turned on a new thinking which correlates the efficiency of  gastric bypass surgery to changes in  microbiological profile brought about by the surgery. Some studies had shown that the microbial profile of the intestine in an obese person changed significantly after the surgery, becoming more like that of someone who was thin. But was the change due to surgery itself, or from the weight loss that followed the operation? And did the microbial change have any effects of its own? True such studies would be difficult and time-consuming in humans and researcher had to use laboratory mice, which were fattened up with a rich diet. One group had gastric bypass operations, and two other groups had "sham" operations in which the animals' intestines were severed and sewn back together. The point was to find out whether just being cut open, without having the bypass, would have an effect on weight or gut bacteria. One sham group was kept on the rich food, while the other was put on a weight-loss diet. In the bypass mice, the microbial populations quickly changed, and the mice lost weight.  How the altered intestinal bacteria might cause weight loss is not clearly understood though it appeared that the microbes have caused increased metabolic rate burning more energy.


According to some most recent studies a particular species of bacteria Akkermansia mucilophilia which inhabits human gut and constitutes about 3-5% of the microbial mass in normal humans helps reduce body weight by slowing down of absorption of calorie rich foods across the intestinal membrane. Quantitatively the levels of this bacteria in obese people are much below the normal levels encountered in healthy persons and probably this finding confirms the earlier guess attributing a weight reduction role to intestinal bacteria.A.mucilophilia appears to be able to modify the mucal surface of the intestine so that transport of calorie rich food components is regulated efficiently. There is also a nagging suspicion that even though they are residing in the intestine, they might be playing more critical role in regulating body metabolism in some way which needs to be elucidated. Though the findings were based on laboratory studies using mice, there is a strong likelihood that such a relation exists in humans also. Surprisingly this bacteria also reduced insulin resistance giving hope that one day, not too distant a future, a more affordable and easy to manage bacterial therapy may emerge to attack obesity and diabetes without the trauma associated with highly restrictive diet regime and surgical intervention.


Now that the role of bacteria in body weight control has been technically demonstrated there is need to expand the scope of studies to bring to surface whether there are others also involved in weight reduction and if so their precise role. Establishing the ability of bacteria to control calorie intake by the body may be just one part of the eventual treatment regime that may become a reality soon but any therapy can be good only if there is discipline while eating. A combination of mild diet control and bacterial therapy can be a win-win situation as and when more information emerges on these friendly bugs, aptly called the "gut soldiers".


(After composing the above article some time in April by this author, New York Times published an extremely informative and incisive article on May 15, 2013 regarding the overwhelming influence of microorganisms on human life written by the internationally acknowledges Guru of food technology Prof Michael Pollan. This Blogger recommends this article for reading by every one on this planet to appreciate the role of these tiny creatures which are sought to be destroyed indiscriminately by the modern man in the name hygiene and sanitation using many bactericides including broad spectrum antibiotics! Access the article through the following  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/19/magazine/say-hello-to-the-100-trillion-bacteria-that-make-up-your-microbiome.html?emc=eta1)

V.H.POTTY

http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com

Sunday, November 22, 2009

THE "TROJAN HORSE" STRATEGY FOR FOOD SAFETY


Biological control of harmful vectors in foods is a dream many scientists have, as it does not leave any harmful residues of chemicals used commonly to sanitize the products. Most famous example is the potential showed by Bacillus thuringensis in controlling pests in food grains. Discovery in 1917 of bacteriophage, viruses that stay within the bacteria,and kill others that cause diseases in humans is another example. Consumption of pre-biotics is also intended to increase the population of "friendly' bacteria in the GI tract providing protection against smaller population of infectious bacteria. How ever the revolutionary findings that good bacteria always exist along with bad ones and they can be used for getting rid of the latter under favorable conditions, may have potential in improving the present agricultural practices by incorporating such a biological "warfare" component to prevent contamination at field level. .

Thanks to some smart work carried out by a group of scientists in the US on controlling Salmonella contamination of tomatoes which created a furore in that country recently, a new avenue seems to be opening for using friendly bacteria to destroy Salmonella. Though the finding is mainly in tomatoes, the concept should work for many fruits and vegetables which carry contamination from the field all the way to the kitchen, posing risks to the unsuspecting consumer. Through laborious field work these scientists were able to isolate some bacterial species from the tomato farms which were found to be effective in killing harmful pathogens like Salmonella, Listeria, E.coli O15:H7, though Vibrio was found to be resistant. Similar work in baby carrot field yielded some bacteria with similar properties. If similar work is taken up seriously many "helpful" bacteria can be unearthed with potential to counteract food contamination due to many pathogenic organisms.

The trail blazers in biological control were the plant protection scientists who could develop many biopesticides for reducing use of chemical pesticides in agriculture. Biopestide preparations are to day are available based on Agrobacterium, Bacillus, Psuedomonas, Streptomyces, fungi such as Ampelomyces, Candida, Coneothyrium and Trichoderma. The pioneering work by Japanese in developing the bacterial preservative, Nisin and Diplococci from Lactic streptococci and similar products like acidophilin, lactoacidin, lactolin etc from Lactobacillus species have already established the potential in using bacteria and other microorganism to fight against food borne pathogens.


The bacterial "warfare" strategy for Salmonella deploys live bacteria instead of any extracted or purified fractions with antibacterial activity and unlike bio-pesticides they target pathogenic bacteria, instead of the pests and insects. How such isolated good organisms can be deployed remains to be seen. It could be a treatment of the produce with a suspension of the good bacteria to make the hostile ones ineffective or application of the suspension in the field itself as pre-harvest operation. Probably some more work is needed to fine tune the technology. It cannot be considered a fool proof process as those pathogens gaining entry into the produce through cracks and crevices are immune to the action of the 'basher' bacteria. None the less it is a welcome break through that has potential for adoption by the fruits and vegetables growing community in future.

V.H.POTTY

http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com