Wednesday, June 12, 2013
CAN FRESH PRODUCE "ABSORB" PATHOGENIC BACTERIA AND VIRUS? A DEBATING POINT
Monday, May 30, 2011
E.COLI FOOD CONTAMINATION-ASSUMING ALARMING PROPORTION?
The ubiquitous Escherichia coli (E.coli) had never posed any danger to humans until new strains were discovered a few years ago with potential to be dangerous to consumers. Interestingly this bug was routinely being tested as a marker for testing foods for possible contamination with fecal matters during production and handling. The group of E.coli coming under the Enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) category can cause serious food poisoning, if the food is not properly processed to kill them and it is known to cause even death if not immediately treated. One of the most virulent strains under EHEC is the notorious 0157:P7 which was found to be a major culprit in almost all food poisoning cases in the West.
E. coli belongs to bacterial species and it has been found commonly in the gut of humans and warm-blooded animals. Historically most strains of E. coli are harmless. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli is an exception in that it can cause severe food borne disease. It is transmitted to humans primarily through consumption of contaminated foods, such as raw or undercooked ground meat products and raw milk. Its significance as a public health problem was recognized in 1982, following an outbreak in the United States of America. EHEC produces toxins, known as verotoxins or Shiga-like toxins because of their similarity to the toxins produced by Shigella dysenteriae. EHEC has the amazing capacity to grow in a wide range of temperatures from from 7°C to 50°C, with the optimum temperature being 37°C. Some EHEC can grow in even in acidic foods, with pH as low as 4.4 and in foods with a minimum water activity (Aw) of 0.95. It can be destroyed completely by adequate cooking of foods to ensure that all parts reach a temperature of 70°C or higher. E. coli O157:H7 is the most important EHEC serotype in relation to public health, though other serotypes are also emerging causing occasional outbreaks.
Symptoms of the diseases caused by EHEC may include abdominal cramps, diarrhea, fever and vomitting. It may take any where from three to eight days for the bacteria to be fully incubated and act in human body though most cases can be diagnosed within three to four days. When properly treated the affected person can recover within 7-10 days, though in a few cases, especially when young children and old people are affected the infection can be life-threatening. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) one of the diseases caused by this bug is characterized by acute renal failure, haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia. It is believed that up to 10% of patients with EHEC infection may develop HUS, with a fatality rate ranging from 3% to 5%. It can cause neurological complications including seizure, stroke and coma in about 25% of HUS patients and chronic renal sequelae in around 50% of survivors. Some of the outbreaks due to EHEC have involved a high number of cases, such as in Japan in 1996, where an outbreak linked to contaminated radish sprouts in school lunches affected thousands of children. Data on the situation in most developing countries are limited, as surveillance for this pathogen is not done routinely and documentation practices are not in vogue.
Why is that EHEC infection is reported more commonly in Western countries and other affluent populations where hygiene and sanitation awareness is very high? Why is that this infection does not affect people in countries like India where food crops are cultivated in rural areas where open defecation is practiced with high probability of the crop getting contaminate? Probably because Indians consume almost all their foods in overcooked conditions while the salad eating practice based on raw vegetables is prevalent in the West.The serotype O157:H7 which has been studied extensively, is easily differentiated biochemically from other E. coli strains. Interestingly this bug is present in great numbers in cattle and other ruminants such as camels and is transmitted to humans primarily through consumption of contaminated foods, such as raw or undercooked ground meat products and raw milk.
Fecal contamination of water and other foods, as well as cross-contamination during food preparation containing beef and other meat products, contaminated surfaces and kitchen utensils, will also lead to infection. Examples of foods implicated in outbreaks of E. coli O157:H7 include undercooked hamburgers, dried cured salami, unpasteurized fresh-pressed apple cider, yogurt, cheese and milk. What is worrying the food safety experts is that increasing number of outbreaks are now being associated with the consumption of fresh horticultural produce like sprouts, lettuce, coleslaw, tomato, cucumbers, salad etc, which are eaten raw without thermal processing. Possibly these fresh produce materials are contaminated due to contact with feces from domestic or wild animals at some stage during cultivation, handling and storage.
EHEC has also been isolated from bodies of water (ponds, streams), wells and water troughs, and has been found to survive for months in manure and water-trough sediments. Waterborne transmission has been reported, both from contaminated drinking-water and from recreational waters. Organic foods which are produced using natural manure can be most vulnerable to infection by EHEC. Person-to-person contact is an important mode of transmission through the oral-fecal route. There are also instances where infected individuals show no clinical signs of disease but pass on the infection to others. The duration of excretion of EHEC from the body is about one week or less in adults, but can be longer in children. Visiting farms and other venues where the general public might come into direct contact with farm animals has also been identified as an important risk factor for EHEC infection.
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
"RAITHA SANTHE"(FARMERS' MARKET)-THE NEW SYMBOL OF GROWER-CONSUMER BHAI BHAI!
The woes of growers in India are well known and no wonder more and more of this breed are finding life miserable due to poor returns from their avocation. Small land holdings, difficulty to access easy source of short term finance, uncertainties of weather, poor infrastructure, wide spread operation of middlemen who deny reasonable prices for the crops all contribute to the miseries of the farmer. While durable foods like cereals have Minimum Support Price (MSP) scheme of the government, guaranteeing reasonable returns for their crops, the perishables suffer from seasonal price fluctuations and demand-supply uncertainties which cannot be surmounted unless low temperature storage and transport facilities are available at affordable cost. The fear of perishability and glut in production invariably have a price depressing effect making cultivation of these foods a "professional hazard". To add to these difficulties, there is no insurance scheme that will compensate for crop loss due to circumstances beyond the control of the farming community.
The Fruit and Vegetable project taken up by National Dairy Development Board, Anand in the mid-1980's addressed the problems of the growers by establishing cooperative societies in growing areas and processing facilities combined with selling net works in urban areas like New Delhi. Unfortunately the project has not been able to achieve any spectacular success similar to the milk project which made India the top producer of this vital food in the world. In Karnataka itself, Horticultural Producers' Cooperative (HOPCOMS) did commendable job by linking producers directly with the consumer but has not been able to make any significant impact in the market. Organized retailing players owning huge sales outlets in major metropolitan areas did raise hope that their economic and organizational clout would benefit both growers and the consumers by eliminating middle men. But the results so far have belied that hope.
Weekly shandies organized in different rural areas are serving the purpose of providing an opportunity to village folks around the area to expose their products including fresh foods to buyers hailing from nearby settlements at very reasonable prices. These shandies serve a very useful purpose in that both consumers and farmers are mutually benefited. What puts off the buyers, how ever, is the unorganized, dusty, unclean and poor facilities and many potential customers do not opt for such an adventure fearing about diseases and allergies. With no facilities for drinking water or toileting or even for resting for some time without being exposed to the Sun, senior citizens and elderly customers do not consider such places worth visiting, denying them the benefits of buying fresh fruits and vegetables at bargain prices. Added to this the transportation facility to such shandies is very limited.
In Mysore growers of fruits, vegetables and similar fresh food materials gather every day on the side of a half kilometer stretch of a road offering their wares in bargain prices and more than hundred such farmer-vendors participate in this "unofficial' market to cater to the needs of thousands of buyers who regularly congregate at this point to get their daily needs of fresh foods. Same logistical problems that face the rural weekly shandies are experienced here also, with no civic authority officials bothered about such gross neglect. Thanks to some sudden awakening amongst the babus who control the destiny of people in a city like Mysore with two plus million population, a grandiose plan has just been announced for establishing a permanent Farmers' Market (Raitha Santhe) in a nearby vacant place with modern facilities.
According to the plan made public recently, there will be 400 sheltered "stalls" for allotting to genuine farmers for a season so that he can bring his produce directly to the market without the help of any "commission agent" and get maximum price. The proposed Market is expected to have decent civic amenities including parking area for modern day consumers to enjoy the experience of buying "straight" from the farmer at reasonable prices. Major difference between this type of market and the traditional markets is that the latter is controlled by middle men, harvest contractors, "muscle" people etc with high speculative and money power. Even if the produce is perishable the sellers in to day's market system do not reduce prices, not bothered about the wastage at the end of the day. The cold storage facilities are also used by these middlemen to hoard some less perishable produce to manipulate the market prices. Hopefully such things will not happen in the new facility to be built exclusively for farmers. Long live the newly evolving "farmer-consumer" bhai bhai relationship!
V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/
http://foodtechupdates.blogspot.com
Saturday, March 28, 2009
NON-THERMAL PATEURIZATION-FUTURISTIC TECHNOLOGY
Cold sterilization and pasteurization processes are generally based on gamma radiation or X-Ray exposure at ambient temperature without recourse to heating. They have the unique advantage of not affecting the organoleptic quality or the nutrient content of the foods processed. How ever both these technologies are viewed with suspicion by the consumers because of the use of radiation energy which is mistakenly being associated with the lethal Hiroshima Atom Bomb responsible for the death and miseries of thousands of people during World War II. Tons of scientific data have been generated to prove the absence of live radiation in the products treated and more than 40 countries have cleared the use of gamma radiation in selected foods for both indigenous consumption as well as for exports. As for X-Ray treatment, it is a young technology, yet to take off, with lot of promises.
Food contamination with pathogens like E.coli, Salmonella, Listeria, etc is assuming alarming proportion in some of the developed countries in the American and European continents in spite of strict vigilance and the much acclaimed monitoring systems in place. Yet these countries could not prevent the outbreak of E.coli infection in spinach in 2006 in USA killing 3 people and sickening another 200. In USA alone 40000 cases of Salmonellosis per year are being reported killing at least 400 people and 70000 cases of E.coli infection resulting in dozen fatalities. The recent Salmonella contamination reported in Peanut products made in USA, requiring calling back of millions of dollars worth of products containing peanut paste or butter as an ingredient, is still fresh in our memory, hitting hard the credibility of their safety monitoring machinery.
Most difficult materials to be decontaminated are fresh farm produce as they suffer significant quality damage if standard thermal treatment regime is adopted. Though Salmonella is associated more with fish and meat products, their presence in fresh produce is suspected to be due to careless farm practices and indifferent handling in the packing sheds. Treatment with chlorine does help to some extent but this is not a fool proof practice and post-treatment cross infection can still take place with potential hazard to the consumer. Food chain accountability being lax in many countries, it is becoming increasingly difficult to trace the source of infection.
The prayer by the industry for a low cost technology for decontamination of thermally sensitive foods seems to have been answered by the development of a technique using low wattage electricity in the US. Though it may take some time before commercial equipment become available for decontamination of foods, the promise it holds for the future of food industry may be exciting. Excellent results have been reported with tomatoes which after packing in sealed plastic bags were exposed to a plasma field created by two high voltage, low wattage electric coils on either side. Generation of Ozone from the oxygen present with in the bag kills the pathogens within a matter of few seconds. After the treatment ozone does not stay to cause any oxidative damage to the contents and decomposes to the original atomic oxygen. Besides tomatoes, this treatment was found to be effective for spinach also and may work for any food material. The low electricity consumption of 30-40 watts, practically no rise in temperature in side the bag, no electrode intrusion into the container and suitability of both flexible and rigid plastic containers, make this technique attractive to processors as well as the consumers.
Before this technique is adopted some questions regarding use of ozone in food system need to be addressed. Generally ozone is considered a pollutant when it is present at the ground level and it is known to cause head aches, burning eyes and irritation in the respiratory passage at levels as low as 100 ppb. How much residue will remain in the treated produce must be assessed after processing. A concentration of 300 ppb is necessary to get a 99.99% kill of food borne pathogens. Also of importance is the susceptibility of the packaging material to ozone action and possibility of chemicals and artifacts generated that can contaminate the contents during processing. A claim that ozone can decontaminate fruits ad vegetables with respect to pesticide residues also calls for further study. Optimum time of processing for total kill, influence of moisture in the product on the efficacy of the process, effect of varying sizes and shapes of the materials to be treated on the product quality, etc will have to be worked out for different products.
It is likely that the above process, if technically found feasible, will be eventually patented and cost of acquiring it may be exorbitant. In the mean time why not Indian food scientists work on this principle and come out with a successful low cost gadget that will benefit thousands of small scale processors in extending the shelf life of many fresh as well as processed products in the country. Such innovations only can drive Indian food industry up the growth chart on a sustained basis.
V.H.POTTY
http://vhpotty.blogspot.com/